These two countries must now seriously follow up on agreements made

Dear Editor,

The recent visit by President Donald Ramotar to meet with his counterpart in Suriname, Desi Bouterse would hopefully bring some positive results to the peoples of both countries. Based on media reports, the wide range of issues that were discussed are relevant to both sides and every effort must now be made by representatives of the two countries to follow up on those agreements to ensure that discussions move apace.

Bridging the Corentyne River and tackling crossborder crime, and working to ensure food security are among several issues of mutual importance. Guyana and Suriname have a history of enjoying good neighbourly relations and there are many areas which both sides can explore to the benefit of all.

Many Guyanese have taken up permanent residence in Suriname and some of our businessmen go there to do business. Hence, the bridge across the Corentyne River would considerably enhance trade and economic relations as well as cultural exchanges between the two countries. I am therefore pleased that the two leaders agreed to have a joint approach to the Inter-American Development Bank (IDB) for the purpose of identifying modalities for financing.

Ramotar and Bouterse also underscored the vast potential for cooperation in the field of industrial development, especially in the exploration and exploitation of the available natural resources.

The potential for joint exploitation of mineral resources was highlighted, as well as the need for increased technical cooperation at all levels.

Both countries must now continue in their efforts towards intensified cooperation and sharing of knowledge, expertise and information in the field of petroleum exploration and production.

Another major issue that was dealt with was that of cross border crime. The fact that criminal elements are using the borders between the two countries to carry out criminal activities poses a serious threat to both countries’ national security. I have always called for the borders between the two countries to be tightened up so as to prevent the level of illegal activities from taking place.

Also, in view of recent robberies at sea, both countries must work collaboratively to address this phenomenon, which poses a challenge for the fishing industries of both countries. Many of our fisherfolk have been attacked at sea, most times in Surinamese waters. Sometimes law enforcement officers seem lost as to how to tackle the problem, and one may even assume that there is limited collaboration between the two sides to catch the perpetrators. Let us now hope that from these discussions will come concrete decisions, followed up by the necessary action, in order to achieve the desired results.

Yours sincerely,

C Racheal