Amerindians do not see themselves as ‘tools’ and ‘subjects’ of the government

TIMES INT'L

Dear Editor,

I am forced to ask Patrick Fitzpatrick on whose behalf he is speaking. He made claims in his letter that was published in another section of the media that the National Toshaos Council is emerging to be one which is committed to carrying out the policies of the government, even if it (he means the policies) adversely affects Amerindians. Well, I have some pertinent and debunking comments to offer.

First, did the administration of the past (meaning the PNC) show any consideration for the Amerindian people of this country? These sessions have been going on for five years now, and it is only now that potential naysayers are seeking to politicise these conferences. Where were these carpers and complainers all these years? I urge Fitzpatrick to ask for the opinion of these toshaos as regards persons speaking on their behalf.

The toshaos resent this. They can speak eloquently for themselves. They do not see themselves as ‘tools’ and ‘subjects.’ Currently, the government is assiduously making every effort to ensure that the Amerindian people be consulted and enlightened about proposed projects for their communities. So it is not a ‘hand-me-down’ system and governance.

The ambience is fraternal and mutual. In these meetings, the Amerindian leaders thrive in the reciprocity afforded them.

Thus it was really the involvement of the people themselves in this process.

So you can wonder (as long as you have time to waste, Fitzpatrick) regarding “how long it would take the Amerindian leaders to realise that the head of the National Toshaos Council was politically motivated and does not represent the cause of fellow Amerindians”. That may become your lifelong ambition.

Most Amerindians do understand the mandate of the council. They also understand and appreciate what is happening and who are benefiting. Do you expect them to go against their own good? Do you think these people are stupid? They resent your kind of sophistry.

I close by reminding you that, irrespective of Norway and the World Bank (as President Jagdeo explained), hinterland development will go on.

That is a commitment the PPP has made, and one it hasn’t reneged on.

Sincerely yours,

Paul Arsende

Related posts